INtake writer drinks the kool-aid regarding IndyGo
Topic: Transportation
Posted: Mon, Sep 19, 2005
INtake Weekly did an article this week on taking the IndyGo bus as a transportation. The article's writer, Meghan McCormick, is a bit too much of a cheerleader on the subject, and glosses over a few issues with our public transportation that a serious reporter would address. One like me.
I have taken the bus, and it's not pretty, the way Meghan describes. Oh, the bus is clean, and in general the people are very pleasant. The problems are with the schedules and routes.
I took the bus to work for a week three years ago, when my car was in the shop having the transmission replaced. I caught the bus downtown on Route 18 - Nora, and took it north to my workplace, which is in an office park on the far north side of town. Although this was three years ago, none of the problems I'm discussing here have been resolved, and most have been made worse by reduced schedules and routes, so the schedule here is even less flexible than it was when I took the bus.
The timing of the morning bus to work was a pain, because the schedules for the route I needed to take were too far apart. I either arrived at work quite early or quite late depending on which bus I got on. The buses needed to run more frequently for me to get to work at a reliable time. At the end of the trip, the stop closest to my work place was five blocks away, and on a road that had no pedestrian sidewalks at the time, so I had to schlep the distance amidst traffic on a busy street.
The ride home was more difficult, because the only bus home ran just after I was supposed to be off work, and I had to go five blocks to the stop to make the bus. I could have waited for the next bus, but it didn't run until 8:19 p.m., so if I missed the bus I was out of luck. Forget going to the grocery store, or running errands after work; I had to wait until the weekend to accomplish those.
Meghan describes the ride as "30 minutes of priceless peace and quiet" but my ride was quite a bit longer than that; it took between 45 minutes and an hour to arrive at my destination, and that's not including the time spent walking to the stop from my home or work, or the time I spent waiting at the stop for the bus to arrive. For people who have to ride the bus every day, taking public transportation eats a significant portion of their daylight hours.
If you take a look at the IndyGo map (PDF File), it becomes apparent that significant portions of the city aren't covered very well, so if you're going somewhere that isn't a major retail area, you're out of luck. So long, friends in the 56th and Guion Road area.
I'm not saying that public transportation is a bad thing, or that I would necessarily prefer to drive my car. But the trade-offs for me weren't significant enough for me to park my vehicle and ride instead. IndyGo will need to add lots more buses to their schedules and routes before I would feel comfortable with considering it to be a regular option.
And for people who have to take the bus because they have fewer options than I do, addressing these issues could create a major change in their quality of life. These are some of the things that those who tout the "why don't they pull themselves up by their bootstraps" party line don't take into account.
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.indyscribe.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/154
Categories
- About Us
- Board and Video Games
- Books
- Day Trips
- Events & Festivals
- Film & TV
- Geek Bling
- History
- Hoosier Oddities
- Indianapolis In the News
- Indianapolis Living
- Kids' Stuff
- Local Attractions
- Local Celebrities
- Museums and Visual Arts
- Music
- Night Life
- Photos
- Restaurants
- Shopping
- Sports
- Theater
- Transportation
- Weather
Archives
IndyScribe Authors
- Jennifer Bortel
- Brad Koch
- Brent Mundy
Comments
1. Oct 7, 05 12:06 PM | Norm said:
It's still cheaper than taking a cab, but it sure points out a need for a light rail system to form the backbone of public transportation. Buses should be feeding a central transportation system instead of providing the limited coverage they do.
2. Dec 16, 05 12:51 AM | Derek Crider said:
Please note that Indy once had a decent transit system that well served the urbanized area. As the central core died (was killed) and the outer townships grew, the same number of buses which once served a 45 square mile Indianapolis had to serve an almost 400 square mile Indy-Marion County. And with more that 30 year of opressive, anti-transit action of the city-county council and the final kiss of death given by the Goldsmith administration, Indianapolis became the largest population are in the nation with the absolute worst transit system. Compare Indy's paltry 30,000 or fewer daily riders and 125 buses, to a comparably-sized Portland, Oregon wher more than 600 buses and three light rail lines carry 300,000 daily riders. Indy is a disaster for transit, a laughingstock in the the transit industry, and a textbook case of how not to operate transit. Please note, the average person in Indy has not idea what a transit center is. Why? Kudos to the Indy Metro staff; the city-county council, however, should be embarassed and ashamed to further deny funding and the impede a truly regional (beyond the Marion County line) transit system.
3. Feb 17, 06 01:57 PM | DeWayne Knight said:
I have written to Mike Speedy of City Council regarding IndyGo's bleak future. In the letter, I stated that IndyGo was bellyaching about lack of money again, despite a bailout by The City in 2004 that prevented the agency from bankruptcy. The sensible thing for The City is to give IndyGo riders a 1 year's notice if mass transit will be permanently shut down, so riders can explore other transportation options, such as carpooling. If Councilmen Phil Borst and Ron Gibson cannot agree on how to fund IndyGo, it will be added to the growing list of extinct Indianapolis corporations.
4. May 5, 06 03:02 PM | garin said:
i think Meghan McCormick is pretty!!!