Gov. Daniel's State of the State Address
Topic: Indianapolis In the News
Posted: Wed, Jan 19, 2005
I watched a bit of this on TV last night. The overwhelming message I got from it was our need for fiscal responsibility. The Governor is planning to either cut or flatten spending on our state programs. A couple of his major ideas for solving our problems poked through to the surface; reform property taxes and imposing a one time tax of 1% on people making more than $100,000 per year. See a full transcript of the State of the State Address. Here's a little of it to set the tone...
The state of our state is far from sound. The state of our state needs serious attention. The foundation is still firm, but major repairs are overdue.
How will this impact us in Indy?
TrackBacks
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.indyscribe.com/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/74
Categories
- About Us
- Board and Video Games
- Books
- Day Trips
- Events & Festivals
- Film & TV
- Geek Bling
- History
- Hoosier Oddities
- Indianapolis In the News
- Indianapolis Living
- Kids' Stuff
- Local Attractions
- Local Celebrities
- Museums and Visual Arts
- Music
- Night Life
- Photos
- Restaurants
- Shopping
- Sports
- Theater
- Transportation
- Weather

Comments
1. Jan 19, 05 07:27 PM | Mike said:
Since I only make ~$23,000/yr, I don't think I will be directly affected by this. Since he is just barely into his term, I guess we'll have to wait and see.
I just hope he gets going on the Daylight Savings Time issue. That issue doesn't cost me money, but it is annoying to be out of synch with most of the rest of the country.
2. Jan 20, 05 06:23 AM | Steph Mineart said:
I'm not sure what his plans are to "reform property taxes" but I dread the idea. I got quite a hit in the last property tax reform. I don't make over $100,000 either, so that will hardly affect me, but if it truly does make up half the deficit, then lead on. And on the daylight savings time issue, I'd prefer that the whole country ditch the idea altogether, because I never bought into the reasoning. But since that's not going to happen, I'd rather we weren't out of synch with everyone else.
3. Jan 20, 05 09:13 AM | Michael Packer said:
1% seems like a good idea when you think in terms of "sticking it to the man", but really - a two income household that brings in a combined 100k per year is still pretty middle class. I heard on the news today that there would be education cut-backs as well - benefitting schools with a higher enrollment rate while reducing funding for those with flat or declining enrollment. I guess we'll just have to see.
4. Jan 20, 05 01:17 PM | Norm Stephens said:
There's a point where daylight saving's time doesn't really make any real difference and Indiana is located on that spot. Part of Indiana will always be on a different time zone, no matter what is decided, due to the metro areas of Chicago, Cincinati, and Louisville. I suppose we could draw a line right down the middle of Meridian and split Eastern from Central. The big advantage to that would be to thin the morning and evening rush hour traffic by adding another hour.